Breaking news- 2 most valuable higher education searches- 1) what are www youth ambassadors for sdgs? what is AI for valuetrue market purpose?how'd you like to search WRJ blog by value chains eg vc1 money vc2 AI & human tech vc3 health vc4 arts and communities happy stuff including olympics vc5 girls safety vc6 education for livelihoods vc7 food as nutrition security & diversity vc8 infrastructure for win-win trade maps vc9 true media
breaking the last empire : americans need to vote now are they separate and superior speciesn OR are they like the rest of the 8 billion of us? new summer 2019 : drucker ::::60 years ago dad, norman macrae, started the first of 100 conversations on AI (Artificial Intelligence), He had just surveyed how Japan was rising (lifting potentially Asians everywhere out of colonial era poverty) round brilliant engineers (bullet trains, container superports , microelectronics, the most reliable engines in the world) - from tokyo he brought back a pocket calculator- what would schools and the world be like if everyone had one of these?

Within a few years the world was debating if tech helps man reach the moon is there any mission impossible on earth.
5G 2020s (4 3 2) 1 G 1970s
And Gordon Moore of Intel had just written a paper promising that microelectronic engineers would improve tech 100 fold every G decade to 2020s -that's a trillion fold more powerful microchips in 2030 than man raced to the moon with. So who's knowledge should teachers and everyone linkin to now if millennials are to be the first sustainability generations and THE UN 17 sdgs are to be celebrated as possible wherever the next girl is born. We welcome your nominations: here are a few examples back from the future of 2030 followed by an approximate chronological order. If in doubt as to whether we know your favorite WRJC please search this blog and mail us chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk if we have left someone out

Friday, May 17, 2019

liu xin

FOX Business’ Trish Regan talks with CGTN’s Liu Xin on trade and intellectual property informal transcript
586000 youtube views as at may 30 9am washington dc time 
TRISH Tonight, I have a special guest joining us all the way from China
To discuss challenges of trade between US and her home country
She is host of the prime time English language television program over seen by The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)
She and I might not agree on everything but I believe this is an opportunity to hear a different view on trade negotiations: how is Chinese Party thinking about trade and thinking about the united states?
In interest of transparency I should explain that I don’t speak for anyone apart from myself as host of a Fox business show- my guest however is part of the CCP and that is fine as I say: I welcome different perspectives on this show. With all that in mind I welcome Liu Xin host of  The Point with Liu Xin
Please note there are time delays in satellite we will try not to speak over each other: Xin welcome good to have you here

XIN: thank you Trish for having me : an unprecedented opportunity, I never dreamed I would have this kind of opportunity to speak to you and  to talk to people in America- But Trish I have to get it straight I am not a member of the Communist Party of China – and here today I only speak for myself as Liu Xin a journalist working for CGTN

TRISH: Ok -what’s your current assessment of where we ate with trade talks? do you believe a deal is possible?
XIN I don’t know – I don’t have insider information ; what I know is talks weren’t very successful last time in USA -and now I think both sides are considering wat to do next- but I think China government has made it very clear that unless the us gov made position clear – that unless US government treats negotiation team with respect (without using outside pressure) the possibility of a deal may take a prolonged period of time on both sides

TRISH: I would stress: I want to believe something can get done, these are certainly challenging times with lot of rhetoric out there let me turn to big issue of Intellectual Property rights I think we can agree its not right to take something that is not yours and yet in going through some of these WTO cases
 (screen scrolls ) there is evidence china has stolen hundreds of billion dollars though we should not care if its that’s amount or a few cents- how do us companies operate in china if they are at risk of having this stolen
Wind turbine case
Motorola case
massive hacking campaign
Oreo white case
Iowa seed cirn case
Tappy the robot case
Clifbaw case
Allen ho tva nuclear case
File stirage and chuna national health
Unit 61398 case
Great firewall case
Microm tech case
Recorde future cyberattack case

XIN -well Trish I think you have to ask American businesses whether they wanted to come to China? whether they find coming to China profitable or not?  As far as I understand many American companies have established in China – very profitably, and great majority of them plan to continue to invest in China and explore the Chinese market (new tariffs add uncertainty).  I do not deny there have been IP issues I think that have to be dealt with and I think  that across the Chinese gov and Chinese people and me as individual, there is a clear consensus: without protection on IP rights no country, no individual can be stronger and develop itself
I think that is a consensus across Chinese society -  but there are cases where individuals go and steal all over the world – eg there are cases between US companies suing each other all the time over IP rights- you cannot say because these cases are happening that America is stealing or that china is stealing or the Chinese people is stealing – I think this kind of blanket statement isn’t helpful

TRISH:  well I think we can all agree if you are going to do business with some it has to be based on trust and you dont want anyone stealing your valuable info which you spend decades working on but lets discuss tech companies that work with military and government where the issue is not just individual companies it’s the government itself that may be getting access to the etch (I get China is upset Huawei not being welcomed into us markets)- so let me ask: what if we said hey Huawei come on in but here’s the deal you must share all the incredible tech advantages you have bene working on -share with us. would that be ok?
XIN: if it’s through cooperation mutual learning if you pay for the use of the IP of the tech-why not? we all prosper because we learn from each other. I learnt English because I had American teachers and American friends, I still learn  how to do journalism because I have American editors and  copy editors , so I think it is fine as long as its not illegal – that’s how people get better

TRISH:  you mentioned that you should pay for the acquisition of that – I think in liberal economies IP is governed by a set of laws so we all need to play by the rules if we are to gain trust but I think you bring up some good points let me turn to China as the second largest economy, at what point will China decide to abandon its developing nation status and stop borrowing from World Bank
XIN I think this kind of discussion is going on-indeed people say if you are so big why don’t you grow up? Basically I think we want to grow up. We don’t want to be poor or underdeveloped but how do you define things?-don’t forget we have over 1.4 billion people over three times of USA – we have per capital GDP less than quarter of USA and even less than some countries in Europe – you tell me where shall we put ourselves? This is complicated  … people are looking up to us to do more around the world- we are the wprld’s largest contributor to the UN human peace-keeping mission ,we are giving  aid because we know we have to grown up, and thank you Trish for the reminder

TRISH Lets get to  tariffs -I have seen some of you comments and that China could lower some of its tariffs. In 2016 the average tariff (effectively tax ) charged on American goods in China was 9.9% that was effectively triple what America charged on China goods- so what do you think about getting rid of tariffs altogether would that work?
XIN I think that would be a wonderful idea – I  mean don’t you think for American companies’ products in China would be even cheaper and for American consumers products would be cheaper. I think that would be wonderful and we should work toward it- but you know you talked about rule based system- this is the thing if you want to change the rules it has to be done with mutual consensus not just between china and us - what about the European coming, Japan coming , even the Venezuelans coming- you cant discriminate. – I think last time world agreed on the kind of tariff reductions China should commit to was exactly the result of years of multilateral discussions – the United States led by clarifying what was seen in its interest and to what degree to lower US tarifs (nobody could have got started without that, and then China agreed to modify their tarifs)  - it is all about the decisions of countries according to their self-interest- now I agree 20 years later the question to ask isr what are we going to do?- maybe these old rules need change – lets talks about it but multilaterally

TRISH 1974 section 301 includes rule that enables usa to use tariffs if china was taking IP – I think in some way this is what it all comes down to NOW on trust- I hear you on forced tech transfer and I think  some American companies may have made a mistake in terms of being willing to give some things up in near term—but thus is an issue where the country as a whole needs to step in -we are seeing USA do that perhaps in a way that hasn’t happened before  - I mean this admin has identified the challenge but has been unwilling to tale it on- so we are living in different times- let me ask you how do you define state capitalism?
XIN: we see it as socialism with Chinese characteristics where market forces are to play deciding role In the allocation of resources. A market economy where some state owned companies play important but increasingly smaller role -look at today’s picture:  80% of employment is by private enterprises , 80% of exports by private companies, about 65% if tech by private enterprises, the internet companies are private companies – we want to be dynamic and open

TRISH– as a free trade person, I think openness is the way to pursue, it leads to greater prosperity for both us – win-win – interesting I appreciate you being here
XIN thank you so much if you want to come to china you are welcome any time,  I show you around -thank you Tris for the opportunity
TRISH closing remark:  just to say as I told Xin no one wants a trade war but we have to think ,lng and hard about the right next step

Friday, May 10, 2019

Value under 30s Back from 2030 vc1 vc2 vc6
  • Masa Son, what does worlds number 1 ai portfolio compose
  • Schwarzman, how do sustainability world number 1 student colleges hook up AI diversity for all from east to west to south to north
  • Kai-Fu Lee, whats it like to sit in the middle of ai's greatest Youth collaboration hubs? how do we demystify AI matches round big datasets and urgent needs -eg will the machine that studies the most data on cancer spot some solition man's brains aline could not analyse
  • Aisingapore.org whats it like when a whole nation helps designAI as a 5th grade curriculum
  • Jack Ma- how do you help the UN teach every nation’s youthwhat only they can do to humanize AI in time
  • update china's second richest billionaire and most trusted youth technologist has just promised to return to full time focus on changing education from sept 2019


Ka Shing – how do you form a business school branches in global cities if your foundation's primary purpose involves youth futures not just making money as you are already hong kong’s richest

axios is arguably the only major news organisation in america concerned with exploring positive futures- japans nhkworld is outstanding as are the relentless positive investigations of china's tian wei and liu xin

Ted Leonsis - how can you explain to americans that supercity conurbations with over 25 million people thriving are becoming entrepreneurial magnets of 2020s techs greatest advances- and usa is missing out with only one supercities and few cities in the top 100
===================
    From 1960s
  • japan emperor,
  • prince charles and royals,
  • moore ,
  • schwab, evolved world forums from ski slope near geneva - leap forward during 1970s oil crisis- main place where world could meet middle east leaders - connectying biannual china summits since xx - next 1 july 2019 Dalian
  • kissinger,
  • attenborough,
  • Brilliant.
  • Abed...
====
Until 1995 seattle and silicon valley had 95% of the first opportunities to design #digitalcooperation world leveraging a new G of 100 times more ICT every decade starting with 0G 1970s- thats a tr5uillion times moore ict in 2030 ver5sus the moon races of the 1960s- we should want 2020s to value humanAI in every way that is grounded in local communitiues wo wher5ever the next girkl is born she has a fair shot at good livelihood and life

By the start of the 4G decade in 2010s China was offering an alternative model valuing billion more peoples livelihoods than usa west coast -with over 15 neighbors including the corner of the asian continent wher5e 60% of youth live - hubs across every belt road to and from the Eurasia's east coast indcluding japan taiwan hk singapore as well as gateways to mainland china surely needed to be part of every 3rd grade teachers maps as U west coast's silicon valley and emrrald city

the human race will end uness we become excelent at celebrating win-wns -so the 2020s is the bets time to celebrate young job creators from both coastal belts (framing asia pacific centiuy) and everywhere that girls live and breathe in between

INTRODUCING THE DICTIONARY TO WORLD RECORD JOBS CREATOR & TIMRLINES
lift-off began in the 1960s thanks to jfk moon race and gordon moores promise - anyone who hubbed round his web could be sure of 100 times moore InfoCommunitation TRuth every decade - by 1972 silicon valley was named after his promise to humanity - the 0G decade of 1970s was in motion

gates was the first person to scale persona connections with computing by designing the o-s and code of personal computers- microsoft liftoff out of seattle accelerated 1985 in middle of 1G decade - before the end of 1G decade tim berners lee promised worldwide webs and settled in MIT as an alternative alu8mni space to s valley- negropronte was appointed to transform digitl archotectire around a hub MIT calls the media lab

the biggest change to markets ever seen emerged in 1995 seattle - bezos launched amazon, by good fort6une china;s number 1 youth travel guide  (Ma J Ma)made his first trip to usa - seattle 1995- chiense youth had about a decade to experiment wiuth before there was enough G or web or logistics infrastrucure to launch ecommerce or5 other future ways to create smje livelihoods and sustain every community- the race to design sustainable generations moore was on but onloy one american b=ventire capitalksit really noticed - his  Yang J Yang - his belief that 60% of the world's people might hub something extraordinarily diferent ftom usa west coast emerged round 2000 the atrt of 3g decade

back in MIT the other futire shock emerged in 1995- maybe mobiles would become thye unikversal device not personal computers- the quadir5 family as bangaldesh americans wanted the world pooerst vilage women to be the first universal mobile connecors - so they formed a partership which did that will vilage labs out of bangladesh- alt6hough this was noticed by silicon valley investoirs their annual summit6 on m,icrocredit from 1997 became a pr space not an open learning university- again Ma J Ma took note - which was how in 2008 whyen americans used digotal to subprime banking china used digital fintech to destroy cfredit cards at least in china - alipay went o0n to celebrate g4 decade mobiles by doing digital gtranscatiuons mobile to mobile- as dod go=irls out f bangaldesh- something that bill gates started to see in 2010

we have msssed the silicon valley comeback stioy of smart device apps- which became apple's bigt thing from late 1990s first ewith teh g2 tech of ipod and iti=unes - the first apps amrektplace and acceleratining as steve jobs launched the foirst smart phone in 2007

also notable is how google deveko0pped the first mega scaleable model around search - also out of silicon valley- search hubs soon became the r&d networks of choine for digital trafornations of the g3-G4 decade- google helped develop android -in mobiules the oppsouet to apples private operating system

By now china had 3 extraoridnairily innovative stary upo ecosyetesm
everything commerce could creat sme livelihhod around jack ma
everything search cpould lead to baidu
everything that persinal messaging might lead to tencent
everything atyhat G leadership would create for teh sustainability generation around  Ren Zhengfei (interestingly part ofv the short term nighmare of dotcoms failing was the failure of dot untilitioes most famkoust worldcom bhut alsio lucent and worldcome-usa stopped being in the race to lead the decade leaps in digita infrastructire around 2005- this is not china fault its the same disatrous lack of sustainable invetsiment ath caused sub-prome- and teh same fake media in usa which bans ameruicans from ever learning from mkistakes)

hence we publish the main guide to wporkd recird jobs creatirs in chiense first- actually the fiur5st 50 years of future opportunity debates were pub,kished in English in The economist see www.normanmacrae,net where you will see that every sustainable concept6 norman wrote about was turned by bad american academkics into the opposite of what he was trying to help 8 billion epopel search for as moores law raced to the 2020s decade of more comouter brains than hyuman lones - for that story have a look at www.unitedai.city


  1. update on world record jobs creator bezos -see also Chinese Dictionary of World Record Jobs

Thursday, May 9, 2019

masa son

picture from 2019 shareholders meeting illustrates range of vision funds for AI - with eg futures japan wish to exchange with all inspired by empire family reiwa era

https://webcast.softbank.jp/en/

Saturday, May 4, 2019

sir fazle abed brac bkash.com


Chris Macrae

Exploring worldclassnations.com with linkedinUNwomens 
official brac webs www.brac.net www.bkash.com fan webs www.brac.tv www.fazleabed.com

INTRO -Valuation of the G-decades as humanity’s most exciting time begins with gordon moore’s 1965 promise that electronic engineers would multiply communications tech by 100 fold each G decade. That’s a trillion times moore coms tech for humans to linking by 2030 than the moon race of the 1960s. By 1972 Silicon Valley was named after Moore’s silicon chip- the first 2 supertowns of the valley were connected – intel’s santa clara and Stanford U’s palo alto. Becoming an alumni of the G-decades started here for hi-tech entrepreneurial revolutionaries and on the other side of the world in brac bangladesh for the most human of girl empowerment networkers – see Fazle Abed’s and quarter billion girls travels through the G-decades finally united the likes of Bill Gates and Jack Ma in sdg worlds largest NGO partnership=== may 2019 update
0G Fazle Abed: Almost nowhere on earth had less “G” communications technology (but more potential for bottom-up family networking) than the villages of East Pakistan 1970, relaunched as the new nation of Bangladesh in 1971. Yet it was out of girl empowerment village hubs of Bangladesh  Rural Advancement Committee , 1972, that Fazle Abed alumni linked in 4 great community-centric livelihood curriculum HeRD (Health “e” Rice Disaster) as well as the exponential rising of inter-generational investment processes of village banking and education. Microeconomics Reality for the unprecedented 60 year race to SDGs (1970-2030).
Over a billion girls’ livelihoods have been changed for the better by those who understand and cooperatively replicate  and contextually accelerate the knowhow of Fazle Abed .  3 critical timelines of Moore’s G-era show how both China and Bangladeshi women leapt ahead because they needed an Entrepreneurial Revolution solutions in common.
Alumni of Abed at the Bangladesh Rural Advancement committee crisscrossed with the corporate executive world of Shell Oil 1970 and the girls lift up half the sky of rural China particularly that southern region which would be contiguous with Bangladesh if it wasn’t for the geographically illogical partitioning of borders left behind by the English when they hurriedly ceded independence to South Asia in 1948.
In terms of career meaning, founding BRAC was a case of 3rd time lucky for Fazle Abed who had left his country (then called East Pakistan) as a teen to study shipping architecture at Adam Smith’s Glasgow University of the mid 1950s. This gave him the blueprint mapping skills that engineering and architects use to communicate but not a career pathway out of Britain 1960.  So, he decided to return to the family profession of Chartered Accounting, and succeeding in this he became the CEO for Shell in East Pakistan. That was where a cyclone hit part of the country, he was located in, killing half a million people leaving only pieces of Shell’s infrastructure standing. So, bottom up disaster relief came naturally to Fazle Abed as for 6 months he worked night and day helping villagers do this.. He also realized through this experience that Giving Directly (what 21st c world bankers call conditional cash transfer) to people who already were embedded in the community could be a very different financial model than western top down relief where charities fly in experts but by funding dictate must leave before relief turns into development.
Famine was the other massively dramatic killer in the region- fortunately applying the green revolution to rice science could bring food security to communities and village mothers with many children to feed were only too happy to help grow more rice than had ever been seen before. But maternal and infant health was still so bad in rural Bangladesh of the 1970s that one out of 4 infants died of diarrhea – training village mothers up to make a living as basic para health servants who built a rural health service completed three-in-one value chains of HRD. Rural China of the 1970s was discovering the same needs – evidenced by its famed barefoot medics and the accident of how rural capitalism was first invented in China by a rice producing village cooperative. WE can see clearly now why poorest Bangladesh and Chinese village women need action learning networks round the same skillsets to develop family and community.
China 1975 – no non-state companies
China 1976- Diaspora invited to inward invest with possibility of incorporation – all other corporate forms remain illegal
China 1978 – one village rice cooperative decides to redesign round 16 family companies which will look after whichever ones are banished as illegal- they are instantly so much more productive that instead of being imprisoned as outlaws these villagers became the model for China’s rural Keynesianism

 To understand how Fazle Abed empowered village women to develop the world’s largest and poorest nation born in the 1970s- you need to share his relentless questioning of value chains at 4 levels. For the first 7 years of developing BRAC he located himself in one village region mapping over 20 livelihood and training micro franchises. From one region to 200000 villages was the second value chain to map. Third, what national market leadership could be owned in trust by village women. Fourth, what global  (PGP- Public-Girls-Private) partnerships model could enable  financial aid and education systems to leapfrom ahead of each G
AT BRAC The first quarter of a century of village development was done entirely through person to person networking – there was no access to electricity grids nor telecoms. From 1996 to 2010 G2 partnerships came to the Bangladesh villages initially with investors around Muhammad Yunus. This was the most critical period for deciding what national level value chains to integrate around brac (and Capital City of Dhaka)  as a worldwide platform for womens sdg leadership.

 By 2010 Brac had attracted the largest NGO partnership in the world by prioritizing very different ways to transform through the era of 0G to 2G and worldwide partnership development than Muhammad Yunus. As technologists turned  to 3G and 4G note exactly how BRAC became the best partner of the quadirs at MIT and their collaboration including knowhow of coders in Kenya (see Ibrahim and Hughes) became the map for banking for the billion poorest shared celebrated with the likes of Gates Foundation and Jack Ma by 2018. Fazle Abed received the worlds first education laureate at WISE – bangladesh village women had developed the SDG era’s benchmark case of beyond the classroom education. They had launched a university (Brac U) like no other and had integrated the most manual of financial service systems with the ultra poverty alleviation fintech model.
New Development banking for infrastructure can be great (entrepreneurially happy and free) for the 60+% of the world that live in Asia but only if and only if you  continuously ground the action learning curricula of rural girls empowerment
Singing words of wisdom let H”e”RD BE
H”e”RD-BE= Health.=“e” Rice Disaster- Banking Education